Journal / 04

An individual's life asks more of a home than a style can describe

What Parts of Your Life Have No Room?

Kevin Brend · selected studio portrait. The discussion reflects the design approach; no client is depicted.
Kevin Brend · selected studio portrait. The discussion reflects the design approach; no client is depicted.

I've walked into homes where the formal living room is beautifully furnished, but nobody has much reason to go into it. The dining room comes into use every few years when the family hosts a holiday. Meanwhile, someone in the household loves painting but has never made a place for it. Or they enjoy sitting with friends, talking without a television dominating the room. There's something peculiar about having rooms that rarely get used while activities that matter to us have nowhere to happen.

This is one reason I approach interior design through a holistic philosophy. I'm interested in the relationships between a person, the different aspects of their life, and the environments that allow those aspects to be experienced. Discovering those relationships begins with a conversation.

Getting to know the person

When I meet a client, I might ask whether they're looking for somewhere friends can gather, a quiet retreat, or a place to concentrate and work. But I don't expect a few questions to tell me who someone is. I enjoy hearing their stories, learning about the things they do when they have time to themselves, and discovering interests that may not appear in their initial design brief. Often the conversation becomes especially revealing when they begin asking me questions in return.

There's a difference between someone describing the life they think they should have and someone letting you into the life they're actually living. We need to be comfortable enough with each other for that distinction to emerge. Otherwise, we risk designing a convincing image of a person instead of a place for the person in front of us.

My eight-point framework for thinking about the whole person helps me examine dimensions of experience that can disappear when a design process begins and ends with style. Some are physical. Some concern thought, emotion, belief, cultural experience or the conditions of everyday life. Others involve experiences in which our ordinary habits of attention and sense of self momentarily become less insistent. These dimensions overlap; we don't live them as eight separate lives.

The body and the mind in a room

Physical comfort is never as universal as a furniture catalog might suggest. How much space feels comfortable around someone's body? What height is comfortable to reach? Does the seat support the way they actually sit, and can they move through the room without negotiating its furnishings? A beautiful photograph can't answer those questions for the person who will use the furniture.

The mind also encounters the room. Seating can make one kind of conversation more likely than another. A collection of travel photographs can open discussions about places and experiences. A room furnished so pristinely that everyone hesitates before sitting may communicate expectations its owner never intended. These are possibilities, not instructions the furniture gives to people. The individuals arrive with their own histories, but the environment becomes part of the encounter.

Emotional experience is just as individual. Someone might want a chair beside a window where they can look toward the water and be alone with their thoughts. The same person may want an entirely different room where friends can settle into conversation and not worry about every small disturbance. Neither space has to apologize for the experience it offers.

Belief, identity and immersion

Personal beliefs enter the picture in different ways. A family object may retain the presence of someone who is no longer living. Religious or spiritual objects may be meaningful through an ongoing practice. Natural textures, a view, a painting or a collection from someone's travels may have associations that go far beyond their decorative character. I want to know what those relationships mean to this particular person, rather than assigning a familiar symbolic meaning on their behalf.

I'm also interested in environments that let us step outside the version of ourselves we spend most of the day being. Imagine entering an enveloping wine cellar, an intimate bourbon lounge, or a room made richly atmospheric through color and texture. The encounter can shift our attention away from ordinary tasks and preoccupations. Instead of examining the room as a collection of furnishings, we become absorbed in being there.

That possibility belongs to the contemplative and spiritual dimensions of my design philosophy. The ego, with its responsibilities, anxieties and familiar ways of organizing experience, doesn't always have to occupy the center of our attention. I don't suggest that a room automatically produces a spiritual state, or that contemplation has only one appearance. Quiet by the water may allow it for one person. For another, the change arrives through shared ritual, play, immersion, or an intensely personal collection of objects.

It doesn't have to look spiritual to have personal significance. And spiritual experience should not have to be translated into a fashionable wellness slogan to be taken seriously.

Circumstances and choices

No individual lives outside a set of circumstances. Family responsibilities, work, finances, the expectations of a community, and experiences carried from a cultural background can influence both what someone wants and what investments make sense. I don't presume that a person's nationality, occupation or household type tells me which colors they should prefer or how their home should function. It gives me more to ask, not permission to guess.

Practical decisions make this understanding useful. A household with a puppy might choose to postpone an expensive permanent rug without surrendering the long-term design. Someone with young children may want relaxed areas for play and an additional room where more formal furnishings can be enjoyed. The point isn't to demand that every activity fit into every space. A home can support different parts of a life by giving them distinct places.

What is missing?

That brings me back to the unused formal room. Sometimes a family maintains it for an idea of hospitality that belongs to an earlier chapter of their lives. Meanwhile, the person who would love to paint, read, play music or sit with a friend has never been given a space for that part of themselves.

I like the moment a client recognizes the mismatch. It opens a different conversation: What might this room become if we stopped preserving its expected identity and began thinking about an experience that actually belongs to the people living here?

The answer may be a parlor-like lounge, somewhere for making art, a place to talk without a television, or something I wouldn't have imagined before meeting them. My role isn't to tell people which parts of themselves a home ought to express. It's to understand them well enough that those parts aren't overlooked.

← Back to the journalNext article: Designing With What You Already Own →